# Delegators rewards should be withdrawable to a separate address

**URL:** <https://forum.thegraph.com/t/delegators-rewards-should-be-withdrawable-to-a-separate-address/1477>\
**Category:** Research & Development\
**Created:** [February 18, 2021, 10:35am UTC](https://forum.thegraph.com/t/delegators-rewards-should-be-withdrawable-to-a-separate-address/1477 "2021-02-18T10:35:59Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ferosv](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/b19c9b/32.png) [@ferosv](https://forum.thegraph.com/u/ferosv)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2021, 12:17pm UTC](https://forum.thegraph.com/t/delegators-rewards-should-be-withdrawable-to-a-separate-address/1477/5 "2021-02-18T12:17:16Z")

</div>

Of course, nobody wants to break three years of development and great ideas which had been implemented so far.

As time will pas, delegator will become more educated and will have more question to their investment and how and where the Graph could heading …

Let’s talk how it is today, and what could have been done to improve it to delegators and indexers satisfaction…

@indexer_payne has good idea. Let’s think about this proposal as part of delegate 2.0, as well 🤔

> [@Account for delegator "time in allocation" in rewards](https://forum.thegraph.com/t/account-for-delegator-time-in-allocation-in-rewards/126/3):
>
> Is there a reason for why delegations don’t follow the same flow as indexer stake? Right now we have the following: indexers have to stake in protocol, then allocate towards subgraphs delegators are delegating their tokens straight from the wallets to individual indexers I think it would be better, if the OP idea is implemented, to also make delegations protocol wide and allocate towards indexers from inside the protocol, like we do with the subgraphs. You will still have a thawing period f…

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.thegraph.com/t/delegators-rewards-should-be-withdrawable-to-a-separate-address/1477)._
