# GIP-0031: Arbitrum GRT bridge

**URL:** <https://forum.thegraph.com/t/gip-0031-arbitrum-grt-bridge/3305>\
**Category:** Graph Improvement Proposals (GIP)\
**Created:** [April 27, 2022, 7:58pm UTC](https://forum.thegraph.com/t/gip-0031-arbitrum-grt-bridge/3305 "2022-04-27T19:58:12Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 13

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pablo](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.thegraph.com/pablo/32/1623_2.png) [@Pablo](https://forum.thegraph.com/u/Pablo)\
**Post date:** [November 23, 2022, 5:19pm UTC](https://forum.thegraph.com/t/gip-0031-arbitrum-grt-bridge/3305/13 "2022-11-23T17:19:55Z")

</div>

Hi all,

Trust, the top warden from [our Code4rena contest](https://forum.thegraph.com/t/announcing-the-code4rena-contest-for-the-arbitrum-grt-bridge/3624), has now completed the review of the mitigations we implemented for the issues found in the contest. No new high/medium severity issues were found, and there’s a few QA/low severity ones that can be fixed in a future upgrade.

We’re also almost done with our testnet testing plan, and the Council has already voted in favor of deploying this as outlined in [GIP-0040](https://forum.thegraph.com/t/gip-0040-l2-bridge-and-protocol-deployment/3695); you can see the vote in [Snapshot](https://snapshot.org/#/council.graphprotocol.eth/proposal/0x8c3c94e6a3064023eac582d609041524c1f41b70bece62f6c58d303faa42b7e8).

This means we’re getting ready to deploy this to mainnet / Arbitrum One soon. We’ll update here when we do 🙂

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.thegraph.com/t/gip-0031-arbitrum-grt-bridge/3305)._
