I’m not quite sure what you mean by this. It would be very inefficient to log each query on chain.
There is attention on moving to an L2 but it’s a very difficult task for a protocol as complex as ours. @rburdett highlights some of the challenges here: Roadmap to L2 utilization - #2 by rburdett
Also take a look at Brandon & Ariel’s responses.
This is why I feel like simply adjusting the query fee % that is deposited into the curation reserve is the best current adjustment to the curation sector. As we pass some of the other hurdles related to gas fees, then we can start perfecting curation incentives better.
Also, I think it may be worth while reducing the bonding curve (making it less steep). I believe the current ratio is 1:2 and if we were to adjust this to 3:4 or 2:3 it would likely orient curators more toward signaling accurately rather than signaling before others.