decisionBasis here.
Thanks @DataNexus for bringing this up. Hopefully that will finally get council to add relevant info to ArbCharter.
Good thread on related topic: Potentially bad pattern of Indexer behavior [Open Discussion]
TLDR: indexer signalled to empty subgraph, indexed higher-than-average rewards.
Notable detail: some indexers (ellipfra, nodeify) played the game and joined the indexing.
Question: should indexers be penalized/slashed for optimal* behavior**?
(*) optimal in terms of maximizing rewards for themselves and their delegators
(**)including self-signalling
1 Like