Request for information about disputes #GDR-29

Governance & GIPs Arbitration
24

Dear disputed indexer,

  1. You’ve emphasized bad faith multiple times in your responses that aren’t related to the discussion of this dispute.
  2. You presented two different error logs from Grafana and the indexer-agent, citing different handlers (handleBorrowFeeCharged and handleLpFeeCharged) and varying error codes and lines. References to unrelated matters, such as Photoshop or insinuations about intelligence and bad faith(1), are unnecessary and detract from the core discussion.
  3. In previous cases, such as GDR-24, the indexer provided logs promptly, including indexer-agent and graph-node logs. Your reluctance to provide similar documentation lacks clear justification. If your claim is valid, facilitating verification would be beneficial. The arbitration team has also explicitly requested your indexer-agent logs. This request is made publicly to ensure transparency. So it’s bad faith(2) if it’s requested by fisherman?
    Your refusal to provide equivalent evidence such as citing my role rather than the arbitration team’s request—lacks justification. This is a public discussion, transparency is expected.
  1. I didn’t know Erigon2 or Erigon3 exists in Arbitrum-One although you answered my previous question that you are using arbitrum-nitro/v3.5.0, could you clarify further? Seeing that you stated
  1. As previously highlighted in GDR-24, among over 10,000 subgraphs, this particular subgraph ranks approximately #200 in query fees, even after the current deterministic error. This underscores the critical importance of serving queries effectively.
    “clearly predatory behavior” bad faith(3) - None of your 'bad faith claims' can change the fact that you’re the only indexer submitting duplicate POIs and this has been happening since day one of your allocation.

I’m interested to see whether this discussion paves the way towards whether if this is a graph indexer-stack issue or a product of bad RPC data being piped in / indexer operational oversight.

But let’s be clear: I’m here for legitimate answers about why you’re the only indexer submitting duplicate POIs from day one. Since you’ve made it clear you’ll only cooperate with the arbitration team, I’ll let them handle your evasiveness.