# Request for Information about Disputes #GDR-42

**URL:** <https://forum.thegraph.com/t/request-for-information-about-disputes-gdr-42/6684>\
**Category:** Governance & GIPs\
**Created:** [August 18, 2025, 6:05pm UTC](https://forum.thegraph.com/t/request-for-information-about-disputes-gdr-42/6684 "2025-08-18T18:05:28Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 9\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![juanmardefago](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.thegraph.com/juanmardefago/32/1219_2.png) [@juanmardefago](https://forum.thegraph.com/u/juanmardefago)\
**Post date:** [August 18, 2025, 6:05pm UTC](https://forum.thegraph.com/t/request-for-information-about-disputes-gdr-42/6684/1 "2025-08-18T18:05:28Z")

</div>

The Arbitrators are contacting Indexer address `0xeeeee689aa442c607105f29f06d00d2f748776b2` and fisherman `0xbace05744f1d075ba6bb82ebf561c1c3915f5cd3` for a new dispute filed in the protocol.

**Dispute ID:** `0x079e54445401cbf3ff5944d80dbc4ce01ae4ba360205805dced280e89b5d809c`  
**Allocation:** `0x6716d405cd043a605fbf21e75f6fe93abd812a77`  
**Subgraph:** `QmTz4HKTBJWSP9LtBZdtDt5WNiyRuooATXR2mSURReto4N`

Fisherman, could you share the insights or data you gathered that led to you filing the dispute? Please provide all relevant information and records about the open dispute. This will likely include POIs generated for the affected subgraph(s).

* * *

### About the Procedure

> The Arbitration Charter regulates the arbitration process. You can find it in Radicle project ID `rad:git:hnrkrhnth6afcc6mnmtokbp4h9575fgrhzbay` or at [GIP-0009: Arbitration Charter](https://github.com/graphprotocol/graph-improvement-proposals/blob/main/gips/0009-arbitration-charter.md).

Please use this forum for all communications.

**Arbitration Team**

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![juanmardefago](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.thegraph.com/juanmardefago/32/1219_2.png) [@juanmardefago](https://forum.thegraph.com/u/juanmardefago)\
**Post date:** [August 18, 2025, 6:40pm UTC](https://forum.thegraph.com/t/request-for-information-about-disputes-gdr-42/6684/2 "2025-08-18T18:40:03Z")

</div>

As mentioned in the GDR-39 post, we were able to find evidence that proves the indexer used another indexer’s PoI when closing the allocation:

```graphql
      {
        "closedAt": 1752722765,
        "id": "0x6716d405cd043a605fbf21e75f6fe93abd812a77",
        "indexer": {
          "id": "0xeeeee689aa442c607105f29f06d00d2f748776b2"
        },
        "poi": "0x4f8e715ecd3a19f69aaaa901d37331f989fd860d1f9d111872df41f30f31f867"
      },
      {
        "closedAt": 1752703302,
        "id": "0x1c6524165d61c79022374ec0ea365148ee2b8be8",
        "indexer": {
          "id": "0xfc842f81490dcb37e82d416b2d28327dfb24ba9a"
        },
        "poi": "0x4f8e715ecd3a19f69aaaa901d37331f989fd860d1f9d111872df41f30f31f867"
      }

```

`0x4f8e715ecd3a19f69aaaa901d37331f989fd860d1f9d111872df41f30f31f867`  
for both the disputed indexer and the most recent allocation close before it.

Given this is a new dispute, we’ll give the indexer a small time window to respond to it, otherwise we’ll proceed with accepting the dispute.

Thanks!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![alexbadaoui](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/df788c/32.png) [@alexbadaoui](https://forum.thegraph.com/u/alexbadaoui)\
**Post date:** [August 18, 2025, 6:48pm UTC](https://forum.thegraph.com/t/request-for-information-about-disputes-gdr-42/6684/3 "2025-08-18T18:48:28Z")

</div>

Cheers @juanmardefago! I was just about to respond but you beat me to it 😀.

Do you have the signature or permission to process the transactions from 39 and 40? I’d be very grateful if both could be resolved swiftly — and then 42 and 43 as well, since both of em looks clear.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![juanmardefago](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.thegraph.com/juanmardefago/32/1219_2.png) [@juanmardefago](https://forum.thegraph.com/u/juanmardefago)\
**Post date:** [August 18, 2025, 7:09pm UTC](https://forum.thegraph.com/t/request-for-information-about-disputes-gdr-42/6684/4 "2025-08-18T19:09:40Z")

</div>

We’ll try to get the transactions for the ones that have been open for a while processed quickly, but it might take a bit since it does need to go through an approval process. (Hopefully those can be processed today, shouldn’t take longer than that ideally)

Aside from that, 42 and 43 we’ll keep open for a little bit of time just to make sure we allow for some due process.  
IMO It’s still highly unlikely the indexer will have a valid explanation for this, but we do need to give some time for it to have a chance to speak regardless.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![alexbadaoui](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/df788c/32.png) [@alexbadaoui](https://forum.thegraph.com/u/alexbadaoui)\
**Post date:** [August 22, 2025, 3:10pm UTC](https://forum.thegraph.com/t/request-for-information-about-disputes-gdr-42/6684/5 "2025-08-22T15:10:24Z")

</div>

@juanmardefago @tmigone Hopefully the TX clears soon since it’s EOD/week. No reply from grt.stakecn.eth yet.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![juanmardefago](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.thegraph.com/juanmardefago/32/1219_2.png) [@juanmardefago](https://forum.thegraph.com/u/juanmardefago)\
**Post date:** [August 25, 2025, 1:44pm UTC](https://forum.thegraph.com/t/request-for-information-about-disputes-gdr-42/6684/6 "2025-08-25T13:44:35Z")

</div>

I’m creating and pushing the transactions today, since we already gave plenty of time for any response.

Will update here once they go through!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![alexbadaoui](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/df788c/32.png) [@alexbadaoui](https://forum.thegraph.com/u/alexbadaoui)\
**Post date:** [August 25, 2025, 2:32pm UTC](https://forum.thegraph.com/t/request-for-information-about-disputes-gdr-42/6684/7 "2025-08-25T14:32:57Z")

</div>

Just initiated another dispute on grt.stakecn.eth.

They cloned POI from streamingfastindexer.eth again. I’ll wait for 44, but honestly no details needed as it’s obvious and a clear breach.

Cheers !

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![juanmardefago](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.thegraph.com/juanmardefago/32/1219_2.png) [@juanmardefago](https://forum.thegraph.com/u/juanmardefago)\
**Post date:** [August 25, 2025, 5:27pm UTC](https://forum.thegraph.com/t/request-for-information-about-disputes-gdr-42/6684/8 "2025-08-25T17:27:05Z")

</div>

Yeah, just created the thread. If you can include the findings that’d be great, I’ll double check them as soon as I have some spare time.

Thanks!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tmigone](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.thegraph.com/tmigone/32/1398_2.png) [@tmigone](https://forum.thegraph.com/u/tmigone)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2025, 12:38pm UTC](https://forum.thegraph.com/t/request-for-information-about-disputes-gdr-42/6684/9 "2025-08-26T12:38:26Z")

</div>

Dispute was accepted here: [Arbitrum One Transaction Hash: 0x2a04cea792... | Arbitrum One](https://arbiscan.io/tx/0x2a04cea7923db2b36bac8a5f878b0f6ea0c0679b945dd039a68612ef973a5131)