# Request for Information about Disputes #GDR-43

**URL:** <https://forum.thegraph.com/t/request-for-information-about-disputes-gdr-43/6685>\
**Category:** Governance & GIPs\
**Created:** [August 18, 2025, 6:06pm UTC](https://forum.thegraph.com/t/request-for-information-about-disputes-gdr-43/6685 "2025-08-18T18:06:07Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![juanmardefago](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.thegraph.com/juanmardefago/32/1219_2.png) [@juanmardefago](https://forum.thegraph.com/u/juanmardefago)\
**Post date:** [August 18, 2025, 6:06pm UTC](https://forum.thegraph.com/t/request-for-information-about-disputes-gdr-43/6685/1 "2025-08-18T18:06:07Z")

</div>

The Arbitrators are contacting Indexer address `0xeeeee689aa442c607105f29f06d00d2f748776b2` and fisherman `0xbace05744f1d075ba6bb82ebf561c1c3915f5cd3` for a new dispute filed in the protocol.

**Dispute ID:** `0x729399c930a0ca20a31f6d1ef23cabeda1fbe0cde097c351a46c66191330680d`  
**Allocation:** `0xda7455a0e262e76bb41a0ed70a50f9541e6223a4`  
**Subgraph:** `QmSq8WeQ28K6nNSg2JiN1xkC7EhLXHmPMUrUszMxrstdCY`

Fisherman, could you share the insights or data you gathered that led to you filing the dispute? Please provide all relevant information and records about the open dispute. This will likely include POIs generated for the affected subgraph(s).

* * *

### About the Procedure

> The Arbitration Charter regulates the arbitration process. You can find it in Radicle project ID `rad:git:hnrkrhnth6afcc6mnmtokbp4h9575fgrhzbay` or at [GIP-0009: Arbitration Charter](https://github.com/graphprotocol/graph-improvement-proposals/blob/main/gips/0009-arbitration-charter.md).

Please use this forum for all communications.

**Arbitration Team**

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![juanmardefago](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.thegraph.com/juanmardefago/32/1219_2.png) [@juanmardefago](https://forum.thegraph.com/u/juanmardefago)\
**Post date:** [August 18, 2025, 6:40pm UTC](https://forum.thegraph.com/t/request-for-information-about-disputes-gdr-43/6685/2 "2025-08-18T18:40:07Z")

</div>

As mentioned in the GDR-39 post, we were able to find evidence that proves the indexer used another indexer’s PoI when closing the allocation:

```graphql
      {
        "closedAt": 1753969379,
        "id": "0xda7455a0e262e76bb41a0ed70a50f9541e6223a4",
        "indexer": {
          "id": "0xeeeee689aa442c607105f29f06d00d2f748776b2"
        },
        "poi": "0x7a762c6d289f9f883713495c15e3521f8407772213c26bca53734d26628c8b64"
      },
      {
        "closedAt": 1753940722,
        "id": "0x451868d3fcc14a81f4781eb84914758c873f9a0f",
        "indexer": {
          "id": "0x35917c0eb91d2e21bef40940d028940484230c06"
        },
        "poi": "0x7a762c6d289f9f883713495c15e3521f8407772213c26bca53734d26628c8b64"
      }

```

`0x7a762c6d289f9f883713495c15e3521f8407772213c26bca53734d26628c8b64`  
for both the disputed indexer and the most recent allocation close before it.

Given this is a new dispute, we’ll give the indexer a small time window to respond to it, otherwise we’ll proceed with accepting the dispute.

Thanks!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tmigone](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.thegraph.com/tmigone/32/1398_2.png) [@tmigone](https://forum.thegraph.com/u/tmigone)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2025, 12:38pm UTC](https://forum.thegraph.com/t/request-for-information-about-disputes-gdr-43/6685/3 "2025-08-26T12:38:47Z")

</div>

Dispute accepted: [Arbitrum One Transaction Hash: 0x2a04cea792... | Arbitrum One](https://arbiscan.io/tx/0x2a04cea7923db2b36bac8a5f878b0f6ea0c0679b945dd039a68612ef973a5131)
