I don’t normally comment on disputes, and it’s been a while since I posted last time on the Forum. But seeing this whole shebang really got me a bit angry tbh.
There are three cases of indexers self signaling on the network
-
Minatofund - published self-created subgraphs rigged to fail as soon as he sent a txn into the contract. He then signaled and indexed them, and as soon as some other indexer jumped on it, he then would unsignal, trigger the smart contract bug, and leave the indexer with no rewards and lost time
-
The guy who rugged Graphtronauts indexer. Signaled multiple subgraphs with nakashu.eth/freakashu.eth, indexes them with 0x62eecb89c407a731e06e2b2c25563e2a8f96dfaa and as soon as someone jumped on those subs, he would then rug them.
-
Inflex/DecisionBasis - he signaled some old versions or deprecated subgraphs to index them, but he didn’t rug anyone. The subgraphs were there for a long time
Now, we have the following resolutions:
-
Minatofund got slashed
-
The guy who rugged them (and others) doesn’t have any disputes open.
-
Inflex is about to get slashed for half a million GRT for the least amount of offensive actions compared to the other two
Now if Derek wanted to prove a point, he should’ve picked the other dude that was purposedly attacking the network. But I guess he didn’t want to do it, for obvious reasons.
Why? Because Inflex/dB has 3M GRT self stake, whereas that rugger indexer has 270K GRT self stake. You get to fill up your pockets with way more money by slashing the bigger indexer, no?