Request for information about disputes GDR-21

Governance & GIPs Arbitration
4

Dear Disputed Indexer,

I have a few questions:

  1. For the past six months, you have been closing this ENS subgraph with a failed status and the same POI (0xdf1d1d2a861bbc890ddac6650d500394a763ce87885bcf9f56550721aca0e47b). However, at one point, you closed it with 0x0 (Allocation ID: 0xd57745b9559677eb4b5a38355c561d344c1e0fb2). Afterward, you reverted to closing it with the same POI again. Additionally, you closed another allocation (Allocation ID: 0xbc0ec2024d8ec731c9ec2ea9c3b304b424da0961) with the same failed status but a different POI (0xef31e8ea7ad1e53f467bddbb0ecf04bc7372486612d3603551aac2f18ab27daa). According to The Graph Explorer, your sync status shows as failed, and the Query Tool indicates your public POI has not advanced, suggesting you are still on the same block, yet your POI has changed. Could you explain this pattern? (Refer to Request for Information about Disputes GDR-18).

  2. Is there a specific reason you allocate solely to the ENS subgraph instead of diversifying across multiple subgraphs, even those with better APR?

  3. Do you regularly monitor your indexer’s status, subgraph sync status, or logs?

  4. Your indexer has served zero queries since its creation. Could you clarify why this is the case?

Looking forward to your response.

1 Like