Request for Information about Disputes #GDR-43

The Arbitrators are contacting Indexer address 0xeeeee689aa442c607105f29f06d00d2f748776b2 and fisherman 0xbace05744f1d075ba6bb82ebf561c1c3915f5cd3 for a new dispute filed in the protocol.

Dispute ID: 0x729399c930a0ca20a31f6d1ef23cabeda1fbe0cde097c351a46c66191330680d
Allocation: 0xda7455a0e262e76bb41a0ed70a50f9541e6223a4
Subgraph: QmSq8WeQ28K6nNSg2JiN1xkC7EhLXHmPMUrUszMxrstdCY

Fisherman, could you share the insights or data you gathered that led to you filing the dispute? Please provide all relevant information and records about the open dispute. This will likely include POIs generated for the affected subgraph(s).


About the Procedure

The Arbitration Charter regulates the arbitration process. You can find it in Radicle project ID rad:git:hnrkrhnth6afcc6mnmtokbp4h9575fgrhzbay or at GIP-0009: Arbitration Charter.

Please use this forum for all communications.

Arbitration Team

As mentioned in the GDR-39 post, we were able to find evidence that proves the indexer used another indexer’s PoI when closing the allocation:

      {
        "closedAt": 1753969379,
        "id": "0xda7455a0e262e76bb41a0ed70a50f9541e6223a4",
        "indexer": {
          "id": "0xeeeee689aa442c607105f29f06d00d2f748776b2"
        },
        "poi": "0x7a762c6d289f9f883713495c15e3521f8407772213c26bca53734d26628c8b64"
      },
      {
        "closedAt": 1753940722,
        "id": "0x451868d3fcc14a81f4781eb84914758c873f9a0f",
        "indexer": {
          "id": "0x35917c0eb91d2e21bef40940d028940484230c06"
        },
        "poi": "0x7a762c6d289f9f883713495c15e3521f8407772213c26bca53734d26628c8b64"
      }

0x7a762c6d289f9f883713495c15e3521f8407772213c26bca53734d26628c8b64
for both the disputed indexer and the most recent allocation close before it.

Given this is a new dispute, we’ll give the indexer a small time window to respond to it, otherwise we’ll proceed with accepting the dispute.

Thanks!

1 Like

Dispute accepted: Arbitrum One Transaction Hash: 0x2a04cea792... | Arbitrum One