Limiting the Total Supply of GRT Title: Study on limiting/reducing the total GRT supply to increase trust, scarcity, and asset valuation

Summary:
I suggest evaluating the possibility of limiting the total supply of GRT, by setting a fixed cap of 50 million tokens, or alternatively by locking the maximum supply to the exact number of tokens currently in custody.

Motivation:
The absence of a fixed issuance limit may create uncertainty among investors and reduce the token’s long-term appreciation potential. Cryptocurrencies with limited supply — such as Bitcoin, Dash, Maker, Kusama, and others — have consistently shown higher valuations, greater market approval, and stronger demand precisely due to scarcity.

Specific Proposal:

  • Define a maximum supply cap for GRT (e.g., 50 million tokens).

  • Alternatively, fix the issuance at the current supply in custody, disallowing future increases.

Expected Impact:

  • Increased trust and confidence in the asset among retail and institutional investors.

  • Greater economic predictability of the token.

  • Creation of natural scarcity, driving appreciation and stronger demand for GRT in the market.

Considerations:

  • This proposal requires an in-depth study of the potential impacts on The Graph’s ecosystem, particularly regarding the incentive model for indexers, curators, and delegators.

  • Hybrid models could also be considered, balancing protocol sustainability with the benefits of a fixed supply cap.

1 Like

Thanks for sharing your thoughts and motivation around introducing a fixed cap to GRT supply. This is indeed a significant change with deep implications for tokenomics, indexer incentives, and the long-term sustainability of the network.

To move this discussion forward productively, could you please structure this as a formal proposal (using the governance template here) in the forum? That way, the community and stakeholders can review it in a standardized format, provide feedback, and assess the potential impacts more clearly.

Looking forward to seeing your proposal and the debate it will spark :fire: